Fishing pressure on many Minnesota lakes and streams has increased to the level that it is oftentimes detrimental to fishing quality if not to the fisheries resource. To prevent further overexploitation of the aquatic resource, to try to preserve fishing quality, and to protect the aquatic environment, more applied research is needed.
The main function of fisheries research in Minnesota is to provide fish managers more effective and/or efficient ways to manage aquatic resources. Input from all fish managers, supervisors, administrators and bio
logists has been solicited on areas or topics where research is needed to solve specific management problems or to find better techniques. The major areas of research emphasis in Minnesota for the near-term (approximately one decade) will be:
- Regulations – fine tuning existing regulations, increase understanding of angler dynamics and response to regulations and fishery attributes
- Stocking – effects on other species, develop new and more efficient strategies, and guidelines consistent with sound biology (study in development)
- Watersheds – holistic approaches to fish management, develop long-term monitoring programs to effectively identify, understand habitat stressors and future climate change
- Habitat – evaluate new techniques, role of aquatic macrophytes in fisheries, understand cumulative impacts, effects and forecasts of climate change, assist with statewide habitat planning, and provide technical support for large scale projects such as those under the National Fish Habitat Partnership program
- Climate Change – support research that will forecast changes to sport fisheries due to future climate change, including vulnerability assessment and work that will help inform adaptation of fisheries management programs
- Population Assessment – evaluate and standardize assessment tools, improve estimates of vital rates, improve assessments of black bass populations, and develop and implement advance stock assessment models
- Community Interactions – lake and stream community dynamics including bio energetics
- Human Dimensions and Socioeconomic – value, attitudes, regulation effects; provide outreach from University researchers to DNR Fisheries staff
- Long-term monitoring – modeling and synthesis of long term data sets, including the ten large walleye lakes and also the statewide sentinel lakes program
- Lake Superior – filling information voids, vulnerability assessments for salmonids using North Shore streams
- Wetlands – effects of fish rearing, bio-manipulation.
The fisheries research program is problem oriented and is directed at meeting the needs of management on a priority basis. The work is accomplished by up to 11 research scientists and up to 11 fisheries biologists stationed at 11 strategic locations throughout the state. These biologists are supervised by three Research Supervisors under the direction of the Research Manager.
Examples of research activities in the last eight years that have been utilized by management include:
- Evaluation of the recovery of Red Lake using fry stocking with oxytetracycline (OTC) marks, with the lake reopened to fishing in May 2006;
- Success with the OTC technology has motivated a new study that will extend our understanding of walleye recruitment dynamics in large natural lakes;
- Angling regulations – bag limits have been reduced on some species and some regulations, such as walleye minimum size limits, are no longer being considered;
- Walleye stocking strategies – used to develop new stocking strategies to enhance walleye populations; this research has motivated a new study to evaluate the use of small fingerlings as a new strategy;
- Development of lake IBIs – being used by the State Pollution Control Agency to measure degredation in Minnesota lakes;
- Oviduct transmitters in northern pike and muskellunge – being used to protect spawning/nursery areas;
- Sonic transmitters – used in cisco, walley and northern pike and muskellunge to monitor behavioral response to water temperature and dissolved oxygen;
- Lake Superior bio-energetics model – being used in the development of the new 10 year management plan;
- Relationship between aquatic macrophytes and associated fish communities – information being used in developing new shoreland regulations;
- Stream classification system –being used in the new stream survey manual;
- Using gill nets to estimate northern pike abundance –being used in treaty harvest lakes to set safe harvest levels; and
- Walleye spawning reefs in streams –managers are using the developed information to build new or enhance existing reefs.
Minnesota has a long history of managing wildlife populations dating back to 1858, when the first game laws were established that set a 5 month hunting season on deer and elk. Minnesota was also one of the first states to monitor hunter harvest beginning in 1918 when big game harvest monitoring through hunter postcards was first implemented. Since those early years, Minnesota’s wildlife population management program has evolved into a complex system tailored to individual species or groups of species that sustains wildlife populations and habitats, and provides recreational and economic benefits to the state’s citizens.
Minnesota, also known as the “land of 10,000 lakes”, offers great angling opportunities. Over 1.5 million state residents and nonresidents, 16 years and older, fished in Minnesota during 2006. Anglers fished a total of 25 million angler days, which comes out to an average of 17 days per angler. Anglers, 16 years and older spent over $2.8 billion on fishing expenses in Minnesota in 2006 (United States Department of Interior 2006). Minnesota ranks third in the country for angler days provided and third in angling expenditures spent nationwide in 2006 (Southwick Associates 2007).

Who says girls don’t enjoy the outdoors?