Fishing pressure on many Minnesota lakes and streams has increased to the level that it is oftentimes detrimental to fishing quality if not to the fisheries resource. To prevent further overexploitation of the aquatic resource, to try to preserve fishing quality, and to protect the aquatic environment, more applied research is needed.

The main function of fisheries research in Minnesota is to provide fish managers more effective and/or efficient ways to manage aquatic resources. Input from all fish managers, supervisors, administrators and biologists has been solicited on areas or topics where research is needed to solve specific management problems or to find better techniques. The major areas of research emphasis in Minnesota for the near-term (approximately one decade) will be:

  • Regulations – fine tuning existing regulations, increase understanding of angler dynamics and response to regulations and fishery attributes
  • Stocking – effects on other species, develop new and more efficient strategies, and guidelines consistent with sound biology (study in development)
  • Watersheds – holistic approaches to fish management, develop long-term monitoring programs to effectively identify, understand habitat stressors and future climate change
  • Habitat – evaluate new techniques, role of aquatic macrophytes in fisheries, understand cumulative impacts, effects and forecasts of climate change, assist with statewide habitat planning, and provide technical support for large scale projects such as those under the National Fish Habitat Partnership program
  • Climate Change – support research that will forecast changes to sport fisheries due to future climate change, including vulnerability assessment and work that will help inform adaptation of fisheries management programs
  • Population Assessment – evaluate and standardize assessment tools, improve estimates of vital rates, improve assessments of black bass populations, and develop and implement advance stock assessment models
  • Community Interactions – lake and stream community dynamics including bio energetics
  • Human Dimensions and Socioeconomic – value, attitudes, regulation effects; provide outreach from University researchers to DNR Fisheries staff
  • Long-term monitoring – modeling and synthesis of long term data sets, including the ten large walleye lakes and also the statewide sentinel lakes program
  • Lake Superior – filling information voids, vulnerability assessments for salmonids using North Shore streams
  • Wetlands – effects of fish rearing, bio-manipulation.

The fisheries research program is problem oriented and is directed at meeting the needs of management on a priority basis. The work is accomplished by up to 11 research scientists and up to 11 fisheries biologists stationed at 11 strategic locations throughout the state. These biologists are supervised by three Research Supervisors under the direction of the Research Manager.

Examples of research activities in the last eight years that have been utilized by management include:

  • Evaluation of the recovery of Red Lake using fry stocking with oxytetracycline (OTC) marks, with the lake reopened to fishing in May 2006;
  • Success with the OTC technology has motivated a new study that will extend our understanding of walleye recruitment dynamics in large natural lakes;
  • Angling regulations – bag limits have been reduced on some species and some regulations, such as walleye minimum size limits, are no longer being considered;
  • Walleye stocking strategies – used to develop new stocking strategies to enhance walleye populations; this research has motivated a new study to evaluate the use of small fingerlings as a new strategy;
  • Development of lake IBIs – being used by the State Pollution Control Agency to measure degredation in Minnesota lakes;
  • Oviduct transmitters in northern pike and muskellunge – being used to protect spawning/nursery areas;
  • Sonic transmitters – used in cisco, walley and northern pike and muskellunge to monitor behavioral response to water temperature and dissolved oxygen;
  • Lake Superior bio-energetics model – being used in the development of the new 10 year management plan;
  • Relationship between aquatic macrophytes and associated fish communities – information being used in developing new shoreland regulations;
  • Stream classification system –being used in the new stream survey manual;
  • Using gill nets to estimate northern pike abundance –being used in treaty harvest lakes to set safe harvest levels; and
  • Walleye spawning reefs in streams –managers are using the developed information to build new or enhance existing reefs.
Leave A Comment, Written on January 19th, 2012 , Sport Fish, WSFR

This project includes activities to manage or monitor populations of small game, furbearers, waterfowl and other migratory game birds, big game, and the gray wolf. The activities covered by this project occur statewide.

Minnesota has a long history of managing wildlife populations dating back to 1858, when the first game laws were established that set a 5 month hunting season on deer and elk.  Minnesota was also one of the first states to monitor hunter harvest beginning in 1918 when big game harvest monitoring through hunter postcards was first implemented.  Since those early years, Minnesota’s wildlife population management program has evolved into a complex system tailored to individual species or groups of species that sustains wildlife populations and habitats, and provides recreational and economic benefits to the state’s citizens.

Minnesota further documented its comprehensive wildlife conservation strategy in 2006 with the completion of “Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild & Rare:  An Action Plan for Minnesota Wildlife”.  This Wildlife Action Plan provides a strategic framework designed to ensure a sustainable future for all wildlife. Additionally, species plans have been completed and adopted for many of Minnesota’s important game species.

There is a need to provide hunting and trapping opportunities for the public in Minnesota.  Wildlife population and recreation management programs are in high demand in the state.  As evidence of this demand, the odds of drawing moose hunting licenses are often as poor as 1 in 30, and waits for preference drawings for bear, turkey, and antlerless permits can sometimes exceed 2 years.  A 2006 national survey of hunting (USDOI, 2006) reported that Minnesota has 535,000 hunters who spent nearly 6.5 million days of hunting.  According to the national survey, Minnesota experienced an overall increase in hunting participation (+16.8%) between 1991 and 2006.

The benefits to local and statewide economies are also significant. The national survey estimated retail sales associated with hunting in Minnesota at $494 million in 2006.  Note that these figures are conservative estimates of hunting participation and expenditures.  The Minnesota DNR electronic licensing system recorded 579,745 individuals who had purchased hunting licenses in 2010.

Comments Off, Written on January 13th, 2012 , Wildlife, WSFR

This project covers all aspects associated with administering, raising, and distributing cold-water, cool-water and warm-water fish into Minnesota lakes and streams.

Minnesota, also known as the “land of 10,000 lakes”, offers great angling opportunities.  Over 1.5 million state residents and nonresidents, 16 years and older, fished in Minnesota during 2006.  Anglers fished a total of 25 million angler days, which comes out to an average of 17 days per angler.  Anglers, 16 years and older spent over $2.8 billion on fishing expenses in Minnesota in 2006 (United States Department of Interior 2006).  Minnesota ranks third in the country for angler days provided and third in angling expenditures spent nationwide in 2006 (Southwick Associates 2007).

 Maintaining Minnesota’s great angling opportunities requires various types of management actions and operations.  One of the tools used to maintain, expand, and enhance fishery populations is stocking. The reasons for fish stocking are angler exploitation, habitat degradation, reduced abundance of native species, the ability of the resource to sustain the fishery, reintroductions and supplementing current populations (MN DNR 1993, 1994).  Stocking is also needed to provide a fishery where species do not reproduce or are not found, such as salmonids in the coldwater lakes of northern Minnesota and in many streams in central and northern Minnesota. Stocking also maintains special fisheries for kids, elderly, and disabled anglers throughout Minnesota (Jacobson et al. 1999). Many groups, such as legislators, Trout Unlimited, Muskie Inc., and Walleye Alliance, support stocking.  However, some groups and individuals would rather see the DNR rely more on natural reproduction.  Minnesota recently received additional funding through a new walleye stamp and the proceeds are to be used for stocking and related activities.

Minnesota owns and operates five coldwater, three cool-/warmwater year-round, and 10 seasonal coolwater fish hatcheries with rearing capability.  Maintenance of hatchery facilities, rearing ponds, raceways, and the fish transportation (fleet) to ensure reliable production and stocking of fish requested by Area Fisheries Supervisors is required to meet our goal of a quality product. 

Fish health has become increasingly important in the recent years with the discovery of viral hemorrhagic septicemia (VHS) in the great lakes region.  To produce healthy fish and reduce the risk of disease and invasive species movement or introduction, it is essential to have a functioning pathology lab, surveillance and testing protocol and staff that are trained in the most up to date techniques.  Without this, the state runs the risk of jeopardizing fisheries, lose the ability to administer and carry out laws and regulations pertaining to the movement of fish within the state as well as export out of the state, and lose diagnostic services and expertise of disease treatments to the state and private hatcheries.  

The state is charged with utilizing state time and resources effectively and to accurately reflect how those resources have been spent (Minnesota statute 84.027 subd. 14).  The federal government also relies on staff to do the same for federal funds.  Therefore it is important to ensure that staff have the tools to do this efficiently.  By updating our fish disposition database, it will allow us to plan and track fish production and stocking efforts and to be able to report these expenditures to the USFWS, legislature, public, and state appointed advisory groups.

Comments Off, Written on January 13th, 2012 , Sport Fish, WSFR

image

image

Half the park is water but there is scenic upland. It’s not Superior but the view is nice nonetheless.

Comments Off, Written on August 26th, 2011 , Camping, Coach, Fishing, Information, Parks, Wildlife, Youth Tags:

Who says girls don’t enjoy the outdoors?

One experienced young angler (the one standing) offered to have her Dad take her friend, who never had fished before, on an afternoon angling excursion on a local lake in the Twin Cities. It didn’t take much for the newcomer to get hooked.

With nothing more than a inexpensive rod and reel, some PowerBait (the plastic stuff in a small jar that looks like wax worms) and the use of a 14-foot fishing boat with a 7.5-horsepower motor, the friend soon was enjoying the angling as much as her experienced friend … and the Dad, who never wet a line, but had just as much fun spending his afternoon tying lines, baiting hooks and removing fish.

Comments Off, Written on July 21st, 2011 , Coach, Fishing, Mentor, Open Water, Women, Youth Tags: , ,

Minnesota Outdoors is proudly powered by WordPress and the Theme Adventure by Eric Schwarz
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Minnesota Outdoors

showing and telling how to discover and enjoy minnesota’s outdoors